* October 15, 2018, 05:51:40 PM
Register Login
News: Fill in your profile info so others can get to know you better! Not a member yet? Why not? Registration is free!
   
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author *Topic: Site Moderation News  (Read 11248 times)
Members who have posted in this topic:
Mani(21) Bullitt(1)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Mani
Administrator
Offline Offline
Age: 64  Male
Location: Pacific Northwest
Status: Single/happy
Orientation: Straight
Posts: 5776
WWW
« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2017, 11:53:54 PM »

Today in chat we have the case of a female member that had been previously warned about her rudeness in chat. As a matter of fact, she received a one week ban a few months ago because of the problem.

Apparently that was not enough to impress upon her that rudeness is NOT ACCEPTABLE IN CHAT, as today she proceeded to call another member "the dumbest of dumbers" (sic).

It is crystal clear from the chat log that this remark was fully intended as an insult and, indeed, the receiving member (who was new on the site!) not only received it as an insult, but also deleted his account shortly thereafter.

Absolutely no choice is left here but to make good on the many warnings that have been made about removing people from the site that insist upon acting rude in chat.

Anyone doubting the willingness and resolve of the moderators on this site to put an end to rudeness in chat should carefully (and quite immediately) re-evaluate their position.

Mani

Logged
Mani
Administrator
Offline Offline
Age: 64  Male
Location: Pacific Northwest
Status: Single/happy
Orientation: Straight
Posts: 5776
WWW
« Reply #16 on: July 19, 2017, 01:40:18 PM »

This is a blunt warning for a small segment of the dudes.

Anyone that calls a woman a bitch, cunt, or whore will be removed from the site immediately. No excuses, no debate, no grace period so you can say good-bye to your buddies, no nothing. Just the certainty of an immediate and full ban.

This a "House Rule" and not negotiable under any circumstance. It includes PM's in chat. Keep in mind members can screenshot PMs for the purpose of making a report to moderators and that messages in the forum can be reported directly to a moderator.

Justincase2 and Bill888 are two recent members that were banned because of this.
Logged
Mani
Administrator
Offline Offline
Age: 64  Male
Location: Pacific Northwest
Status: Single/happy
Orientation: Straight
Posts: 5776
WWW
« Reply #17 on: July 19, 2017, 01:57:00 PM »

Oh and while I am at it. Moderators are well aware there are some groups of friends in chat that playfully call each other some of these names. That is not what I'm talking about here. I am talking about bonafide abusive language. The difference is night and day in context and moderators will not entertain complaints about playful language.
Logged
Mani
Administrator
Offline Offline
Age: 64  Male
Location: Pacific Northwest
Status: Single/happy
Orientation: Straight
Posts: 5776
WWW
« Reply #18 on: February 24, 2018, 05:10:49 PM »

Because the issue of degrading chat has come up a few times in recent months, causing some consternation and even alarm, there is a new chat rule, effective immediately:

"NO degrading chat in main, even with permission"

Take degrading chats to one of the sub-rooms, or create your own room, or go to private.
Logged
Mani
Administrator
Offline Offline
Age: 64  Male
Location: Pacific Northwest
Status: Single/happy
Orientation: Straight
Posts: 5776
WWW
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2018, 06:54:28 PM »

Because the issue of degrading chat has come up a few times in recent months, causing some consternation and even alarm, there is a new chat rule, effective immediately:

"NO degrading chat in main, even with permission"

Take degrading chats to one of the sub-rooms, or create your own room, or go to private.

I want to clarify a few things about this.

1. Non-consensual degrading chat is never allowed and is cause for immediate removal from the site no matter where it occurs on the site.

2. The only way degrading chat is consensual is if all parties exposed to it have given their consent. There is no way someone logging into the main chat room can give their consent before entering. Also, main chat is a de facto public space. Therefore any kind degrading chat in main automatically violates Orgasmanic House Rule #2, "Always treat everyone with respect and dignity".

3. Therefore, this rule allowing consensual degrading chat in a sub-room should be understood as an accommodation to those interested in having that kind of chat, not as a limitation. (The limitation already exists, see point #2).

4. All parties engaging in consensual degrading chat are responsible for making sure this rule is followed. That means the degraded person as well as the degraders are accountable if the rule is broken.

5. If anyone wanders into a room where consensual degrading chat is occurring and is distressed by it, pause the chat immediately and politely explain the chat is consensual and tell them leave the room if they are not interested in listening or participating.

6. If the words "slut", "cunt", "bitch" are occurring frequently in the chat it will be considered de facto degrading and moderators will deal with it accordingly if it is happening in main.

7. Officially the word "cunt" is still prohibited from chat and the only time moderators will allow is under the purview of this degrading chat rule.

Questions or concerns? Please message me directly.

Mani
Logged
Mani
Administrator
Offline Offline
Age: 64  Male
Location: Pacific Northwest
Status: Single/happy
Orientation: Straight
Posts: 5776
WWW
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2018, 01:14:46 AM »

A long-term member was removed from the site today. This member had been warned on a number of previous occasions about arguing and acting out in chat. The last time he did it (March 25th, 2017), he was informed there would be no further warnings: if he ever did it again, he would be banned from the site immediately, with no recourse.

Today this member picked a nasty fight in chat, and was rude and abusive to other members that asked him to stop. He is now banned, as he was told he would be. For that, he has no one to blame but himself.

It makes no sense to me why someone would behave this way. A lot of things in life don't make any sense, I guess.  dunno

Mani
Logged
Mani
Administrator
Offline Offline
Age: 64  Male
Location: Pacific Northwest
Status: Single/happy
Orientation: Straight
Posts: 5776
WWW
« Reply #21 on: October 02, 2018, 02:34:32 PM »

Lately there's been an uptick of issues and member complaints with respect to what the site admins have come to call "wife guys":

A "wife guy" is someone that shows pics and/or vids of his wife (or someone he says is his wife) for the enjoyment of other men.


The site admins have recently discussed the upsurge in this activity and we've have decided it will not be permitted on this site.

The problem we see with this activity is lack of informed consent on the part of the women whose images are being shown for the sexual gratification of her husband and other men.

That is to say, there is no credible reason to believe that the women whose images are being used even know about it.

Nor is their any credible reason to believe that the women have given their consent to their images being used in this manner!

These are serious ethical and legal problems! Anyone that doesn't think they are, needs to read (and apply themselves to understanding) the recent news headlines.

Going forward, the Orgasmanic policy is as follows:

Anyone that would like to have other people appreciate their spouse or lover on this site, the way to do it is invite them to join the site and participate personally.

Mani

Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

©Orgasmanic 2018. All rights reserved.