* April 23, 2018, 03:32:06 PM
Register Login
News: Orgasmanic is 100% spam-free and popup-free! It's also 100% um... free! Join today for a great community experience!
   
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author *Topic: Saving Net Neutrality. For the american peeps  (Read 1847 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Mercury_Maniac
Orgasmanic Dude
confusion
Online Online
Male
Status: Single/looking
Orientation: Straight
Cock size: 6
Posts: 134
« on: December 10, 2017, 04:10:34 AM »

CONGRATULATIONS everybody! We only have 7 days to fight the FCC & the repeal of #NetNeutrality! Thanks to John Oliver there's a SUPER easy way to do this. Do you enjoy Netflix? Do you find yourself spending too much time on FB? If net neutrality goes away, our Internet bills go up and we give power to companies like Comcast and Spectrum to control what information we can access.

Here's what you can do - takes less than a minute:

1. Go to gofccyourself.com
(the shortcut John Oliver made to the hard-to-find FCC comment page)
2. Click on the 17-108 link (Restoring Internet Freedom)
2. Click on "+Express"
3. Be sure to hit "ENTER" after you put in your name (your name will then feature a yellow box), then put in the rest of your info
4. In the comment section write: I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs
5. Click to Review, then Submit, done. Make sure you hit submit at the end!

C&P this!!!
« ilikeitalot fucked with this post December 11, 2017, 10:48:30 AM » Logged

some people just need to shut the fuck up
Obabe
Orgasmic Test Subject
Orgasmanic Babe
Offline Offline
Age: 60  Female
Status: Taken/happy
Orientation: Curious
Breast size: a mouthful and a handful at the same time
Posts: 466
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2017, 10:49:19 AM »

I did it!  Thanks for the step by step instructions, it made it so easy. 
Logged


It\'s never too late to become the person you were supposed to be.
ilikeitalot
Orgasm Explorer
Administrator
Titty fuck & cum!
Offline Offline
Age: 53  Male
Location: Nashville, TN
Status: Taken/happy
Orientation: Curious
Cock size: 6=====>"
Posts: 2657
WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2017, 10:56:40 AM »

Thanks MM. The only people who are against net neutrality are the companies controlling internet access (and those whom they pay to do their bidding) (oh, and those whom they bamboozled into believing it's actually a good thing). We need to stand up to them and stop this shit.
Logged
Mercury_Maniac
Orgasmanic Dude
confusion
Online Online
Male
Status: Single/looking
Orientation: Straight
Cock size: 6
Posts: 134
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2017, 02:26:08 PM »

I hope it helps

Losing net neutrality is bad for everyone
Logged

some people just need to shut the fuck up
blueflame
Orgasmanic Dude
Offline Offline
Age: 39  Male
Status: Married/happy
Orientation: Straight
Posts: 59
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2017, 08:53:53 PM »

I hope it helps

Losing net neutrality is bad for everyone
Agreed.

Thanks for posting this!
Logged
Scot4U
Orgasmanic Dude
I'm willing to share, are you?!?
Offline Offline
Age: 52  Male
Location: Eastern, PA (near Allentown)
Status: Complicated
Orientation: Bi
Cock size: That depends on you!
Posts: 40
WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2017, 11:22:47 PM »

Done.  Thumbs up

Preserving Net Neutrality is best for everyone - except big corporations
Logged

"If it looks good, eat it!!!"
Towelboy
Orgasmanic Dude
Offline Offline
Male
Location: Canada
Status: Single
Orientation: Bi
Cock size: uncut, thick head
Posts: 16
« Reply #6 on: December 14, 2017, 01:30:49 AM »

what about members that don't live in the usa
Logged
Mani
Administrator
Offline Offline
Age: 63  Male
Location: Pacific Northwest
Status: Single/happy
Orientation: Straight
Posts: 5496
WWW
« Reply #7 on: December 14, 2017, 02:26:19 AM »

what about members that don't live in the usa

Well, you're in Canada (and presumably a Canadian citizen), so you have no standing to comment on this process in the US.

But you might want to read up on the state of net neutrality in Canada. It's been ping-ponging the past decade around but seems headed on the right track recently.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality_in_Canada
Logged
Mani
Administrator
Offline Offline
Age: 63  Male
Location: Pacific Northwest
Status: Single/happy
Orientation: Straight
Posts: 5496
WWW
« Reply #8 on: December 14, 2017, 03:29:09 AM »

There is a very interesting but ultimately discouraging story developing around this campaign to comment on the FCC's proposals.

Public Comments to the Federal Communications Commission About Net Neutrality Contain Many Inaccuracies and Duplicates
http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/11/29/public-comments-to-the-federal-communications-commission-about-net-neutrality-contain-many-inaccuracies-and-duplicates/

Citing directly from the article, "Fully 57% of comments used temporary or duplicate email addresses, and seven popular comments accounted for 38% of all submissions.
 ... There is clear evidence of organized campaigns to flood the comments with repeated messages."


Do take note, one of those "seven popular comments" they are referring to is the very same comment many of us have left on the FCC site, e.g. "I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs".

Most news media reporting on this report has been extremely poor. Note the extreme credulity with which National Public radio reported this story, there was ZERO attempt to authenticate any aspect of the Pew's conclusions, or to dig deeper into the meaning of the story. Brian Naylor came off like a real chuckle-head on this one.

FCC Says It Will Vote On Net Neutrality Despite Millions Of Fake Public Comments
https://www.npr.org/2017/12/11/569983759/fcc-says-it-will-vote-on-net-neutrality-despite-millions-of-fake-public-comments

At least WIRED is trying to dig into this and lend some useful insight:

Bogus Emails and Bee Movie: Digging Into the FCC's Broken Net Neutrality Comments
https://www.wired.com/story/fcc-net-neutrality-comment-analysis-fake-emails/

Unfortunately, WIRED's insights are very stark and discouraging: "Pew's report shows that even well-meaning individuals and advocacy groups attempting to flood the system with earnest comments have contributed to the crippling of the process ... the earnest groups and individuals who want to have a say in their government's rules may need to try a new approach to cut through the noise".

And just what the hell would that "new approach" be???  Huh?
Logged
Mercury_Maniac
Orgasmanic Dude
confusion
Online Online
Male
Status: Single/looking
Orientation: Straight
Cock size: 6
Posts: 134
« Reply #9 on: December 15, 2017, 01:53:32 AM »

since america got screwed again today



* 25299427_1787788277922248_3960208739267575372_n.jpg (31.49 KB, 480x480 - viewed 216 times.)
Logged

some people just need to shut the fuck up
Outsider
Orgasmanic Dude
if only it were this simple
Offline Offline
Male
Status: Married
Orientation: Curious
Posts: 17674
« Reply #10 on: December 15, 2017, 01:06:29 PM »

It's fantastic that "net neutrality" has been repealed. It's far and away what's best for the internet and especially best for the individual user.
It was only enacted in 2015 and in the interim, more than ever, we've seen Twitter, Facebook, and others abuse users and organizations with which they disagree.

One of the single biggest gimmicks of this has been the term "net neutrality" itself, which serves to dupe folks into thinking it's a good thing by the beneficent sounding name. Those that support it are either socialists, simply don't understand it, or are corporations that benefit tremendously from it. Why would Google, Facebook, Spotify, Amazon, etc. support it if it weren't good for them? These corporations don't support it out of the goodness of their hearts, they support it simply because it serves to help their bottom lines.

Classifying broadband carriers as common carriers is typical government overreach into areas where it isn't needed.
Personally, I prefer free markets and absolutely prefer that the government keep its tentacles out of controlling the internet ... leave that for China, Cuba, North Korea, etc.
Logged

ilikeitalot
Orgasm Explorer
Administrator
Titty fuck & cum!
Offline Offline
Age: 53  Male
Location: Nashville, TN
Status: Taken/happy
Orientation: Curious
Cock size: 6=====>"
Posts: 2657
WWW
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2017, 01:52:31 PM »

I'm sorry Outsider, but you are grossly misinformed. The government is not trying to "control the internet"; they are trying to stop the internet's gatekeepers (the ISP's) from controlling it. Most people only have ONE choice for their ISP. Is that a free market? I think not! Regulation is not always a bad thing. In this case, it's to prevent big companies from abusing people who have no recourse.
Logged
Outsider
Orgasmanic Dude
if only it were this simple
Offline Offline
Male
Status: Married
Orientation: Curious
Posts: 17674
« Reply #12 on: December 15, 2017, 06:45:35 PM »

ilikeitalot, we'll just have to disagree on who's grossly misinformed.  Smiley
Logged

Mercury_Maniac
Orgasmanic Dude
confusion
Online Online
Male
Status: Single/looking
Orientation: Straight
Cock size: 6
Posts: 134
« Reply #13 on: December 15, 2017, 09:13:35 PM »

I'll agree on who is informed.
Logged

some people just need to shut the fuck up
Mercury_Maniac
Orgasmanic Dude
confusion
Online Online
Male
Status: Single/looking
Orientation: Straight
Cock size: 6
Posts: 134
« Reply #14 on: December 15, 2017, 09:15:43 PM »

http://reverepress.com/news/comcast-deleted-promise-keep-internet-open/
Logged

some people just need to shut the fuck up
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

©Orgasmanic 2017. All rights reserved.